cameras

Nikon’s D200 (left) and D7100 (right)

I very rarely get ‘technical’ about cameras and am most certainly no ‘techy’, so my search for a replacement camera for my trusty old Nikon D200 was a challenge I have been putting off for too long (a case of ‘better the Devil you know!). So, I went to test out Nikon’s latest top of the range (non-full frame) DSLR model, the D71000, at Calumet photography store in Manchester. I have ruled out a full frame camera for now, primarily due to it’s cost and weight.

Being a little smaller and lighter than my usual camera was a pleasant surprise on handling. When you work alone at weddings and events, you have to think practical and bulky, heavy equipment, however good, isn’t comfortable to work with.

The real test however was about image quality, particularly in low light. So, I experimented in a gloomy staircase where I knew the flash would struggle with the depth. Here’s my interesting albeit not overly scientific result…

D200 shot

D200 shot

old camera 1x

‘Noise’ clearly visible.

With a relatively low 10.2 mega pixels and less advanced software, the D200 struggles when I magnify the corner. Noise (grain in 35mm speak) is clearly visible, which is a problem if you’re shooting a wedding in a poorly lit church.

The D7100 tackles the same location.

The D7100 tackles the same location.

Zooming in on the corner.

Less ‘noise’ zooming in on the corner.

The impressive 24.1 mega pixels of the D7100 and advanced software makes a  respectable job of the same spot, with very little ‘noise’ visible at the same magnitude.

The decision is made. At £839 (body only), Nikon’s latest offering is on my shopping list. Thanks to the very helpful staff at Calumet too.

My next task is to review and upgrade my lens collection.